Lords of the rinks: the emergence of the National Hockey League, 1875-1936
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 Introduction 2 From Fraternal Hockey Clubs to Closed Corporation 3 The Hockey Front in the Athletic War 4 Leagues of Their Own 5 In Search of Hockey Order 6 An Inglorious End and an Inauspicious Beginning 7 Going South, Part 1 8 Going South, Part 2 9 Birth of the Minor-League System 10 Decline of the Ottawa Empire 11 The Rebellion 12 In the Best Interests of Hockey 13 Overtime Appendix A: Rules of Hockey, 1877 Appendix B: Stanley Cup Regulations Appendix C: National Hockey Association Constitution, 1910 Appendix D: Binding Agreement of 1926 Appendix E: Ottawa Gate Receipts, 1927-35 Appendix F: Detroit Gate Receipts, 1927-35 Appendix G: NHL Club Net Average Revenues by Year Brief Biographies of Hockey Personalities Notes Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".