Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ths paper endeavors to ovewiew Ktashen’s Moni秋）r Model theory and itS面廿cs． The Moni紋）r Model， which oonsists of五ve hypotheses， has been one of the most h1∬uential alld oolltroversial theories hl seoond language acquisition． Most of the 面tics came f以）m the de舳tions of terminology血the hypotheses． In the lat£1970s and tlle 1980s， when the theory had reached the height of itS popUlarity and declned， syntax was thought to be the core of language acquisition and vocabular sc， peripheral． In the 1990s， vocab曲y research became conspicuous in place of grammar． Krashen made a breathtaking 90・degree tum over to the reading Hypothesis， Frree Voluntary Readng for the defense of the Moni軟）r Model． Research on vocabUlary in conteXt including the af50rdanoe theory win have an important烈）le in unoovering the mystery of seoond language acquisition．
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".