MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W575329133

Counter-terrorism law and practice : an international handbook

2009· book· en· W575329133 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arvinder Sambei, Anton du Plessis, Martin Polaine

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2009
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHuman rightsTerrorismLawCriminalizationInternational lawPrinciple of legalityJurisdictionInternational human rights law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Introduction Introduction What is Terrorism? International Legal Responses to Terrorism Overview of This Book 2. The United Nations Counter-Terrorism Instruments Introduction: Development of a Global Legal Regime against Terrorism Overview of the UN Counter-Terrorism Instruments Relevant Extracts from the UN 3. Criminalization and Jurisdiction Criminalization Criminalization of Terrorism Offence in National Laws United Nations Security Resolution 1373 Principal Terrorist Offences in the UK Reflecting Domestic Implementation of the UN Counter-Terrorism Instruments Jurisdiction 4. Investigations and Prosecutions Reactive Investigations Stop and Search Arrest Detention Admissions & Confessions Bomb/Explosion Scene Management Proactive Investigations Covert Methodologies Membership of a Proscribed Organization 5. Pre-Trial and Trial Issues Burden of Proof Case Management Disclosure The Media and Adverse Comment Hearings in Camera The Accused's Right of Silence and Access to Legal Advice 6. General Overview of International Efforts to Combat the Financing of Terrorism Introduction International Efforts to Combat the Financing of Terrorism Key Extracts of Relevant UN Security Council Resolutions The Financial Action Task Force Other International Initiatives 7. Alternative Remittance Systems Introduction What is an Alternative Remittance System? FATF Recommendations for Alternative Remittance Systems Abu Dhabi Conferences Other Payment Methods Conclusion 8. Human Rights in the Context of Counter-Terrorism International Human Rights Law & International Humanitarian Law The Sources of IHRL Extra-Territorial Reach of Human Rights Instruments The Nature of the Rights Engaged The Rights Likely to be Engaged During the Course of an Investigation Privacy, Confidentiality and Personal Information Issues 9. International Cooperation Introduction Mutual Legal Assistance: General Principles Mutual Legal Assistance or Mutual Assistance? Extradition APPENDICES Appendix 1: UNSCR 1267, 1456, 1540, 1566, 1617, 1624, 1735 Appendix 2: UNSCR 1373 Appendix 3: Tokyo Convention Appendix 4: Hague Convention Appendix 5: Montreal Convention and Protocol Appendix 6: Diplomats Convention Appendix 7: Hostages Convention Appendix 8: Nuclear Materials Convention Appendix 9: Rome Convention and Protocols Appendix 10: Plastic Explosives Convention Appendix 11: Bombings Convention Appendix 12: International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism Appendix 13: International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism Appendix 14: The United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy Appendix 15: European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism Appendix 16: American States Convention No. 24381 Appendix 17: OAU Convention on the Prevention and Combating of Terrorism Appendix 18: The Arab Convention for the Suppression of Terrorism Appendix 19: Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering Special Recommendations on Terrorist Financing Appendix 20: Commonwealth Secretariat Model Legislative Provisions on Measures to Combat Terrorism Appendix 21: Criminal Evidence (Witness Anonymity) Act 2008 Appendix 22: Police & Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE), Code H Appendix 23: Ratification Status and Depository Information on the UN Counter-Terrorism Legal Instruments Appendix 24: UNSC Resolution 1822 Appendix 25: The USA PATRIOT Act

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicInternational Law and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207