MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W575545056

World Airline Report: Location, Location, Location

2006· article· en· W575545056 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Perry Flint

Bibliographic record

VenueAir transport world · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicAviation Industry Analysis and Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLow-cost carrierInterliningBusinessWorld marketLatin AmericansMiddle EastAviationAir travelOpen skiesWorld tradeInternational tradeAir transportGeographyAeronauticsMarketingEngineeringPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This annual world airline report for 2005 begins with the observation that while airlines in most parts of the world are overcoming the high cost of fuel, North American airlines, except for Air Canada, AirTran, and Southwest Airlines, are mostly operating with losses. Possible explanations for this trend include the series of events since 2000, high labor costs, and a higher market penetration of low cost carriers (LCCs) in the U.S. This annual report is presented according to the following categories: 1) In the World Airline Data section: The World's Leading Low-Cost Carriers; Global Airline Alliances; The World's Top 25 Airlines; World Airline Financial Results by Carrier; World Airline Traffic Results by Carrier; and the World's Top 50 Airports; 2) In the Airline Reports by Region section: Africa/Middle East; Asia/Pacific; Canada; Europe; Latin America/Caribbean; North America; and, 3) In the World Airline Fleets section: World Fleet Summary; and World Airline Fleets by Carrier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1290.213

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAir transport worldSame topicAviation Industry Analysis and TrendsFrench-language works237,207