MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W575862756

BRIDGE REPLACED IN SECTIONS - AT NIGHT : THE LIONS GATE BRIDGE TRUSS AND DECK SECTIONS WERE REPLACED DURING 10-HOUR NIGHT CLOSURES

2003· article· en· W575862756 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael J. Abrahams, Joseph K. Tse, John Bryson

Bibliographic record

VenueBetter roads · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)DeckSpan (engineering)RetrofittingEngineeringSuspension (topology)TrussSection (typography)Structural engineeringCivil engineeringBeam bridgePrecast concreteForensic engineeringGeotechnical engineeringComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An unprecedented rehabilitation project in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada saw the replacement of Lions Gate Bridge section by section over 10 hour periods in the night, while the bridge remained in service during the day. The $80 million effort on the 45 year old bridge involved seismic retrofitting, which included three primary elements: 1) build-up of the existing H-bents in order to longitudinally anchor the structure; 2) allow piers to rock transversely; and, 3) add piled foundations in areas where liquefaction potential is high. The project also included widening of sidewalks, as well as replacement of the suspended span deck. This article details the efforts taken in the restoration process. It is believed that the Lions Gate Bridge is the first major suspension bridge that was seismically retrofitted under a design/build format. In addition to being vulnerable to high winds, the bridge is also thought to be the first major suspension bridge that had its deck completely replaced while maintaining traffic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBetter roadsSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207