MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W576003659

US Investment Ready to Roll

2009· article· en· W576003659 on OpenAlex
Keith Barrow

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational railway journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTransport and Economic Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdministration (probate law)Rail networkInvestment (military)FinanceEngineeringStimulus (psychology)Public administrationTransport engineeringBusinessPolitical scienceLawPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The views of Karen Rae, U.S. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) deputy administrator, are presented in regard to how, in the coming decade, passenger rail will play a much greater role in U.S. transportation. In early 2010, $8 billion in grants will be allocated by the FRA as part of the Obama administration's American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), beginning a new investment era in the country's intercity rail network, which has long been neglected. This includes high-speed rail projects, of which the FRA received 278 pre-applications for funding totaling $102 billion. Rae believes that a few very critical successes must be produced with stimulus funds, or else there will be no high-speed rail program. Rae believes it will only be necessary to have speeds of 300 km/h or greater on certain corridors, such as California. A figure illustrates designated high-speed corridors in the U.S., with extensions into Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it