Central ray deficiency with extensive syndactyly: a dilemma for classification.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Split Hand Foot Malformation (SHFM) (cleft hand/foot, central ray deficiency) is a complex, highly variable anomaly involving the hands and/or feet. A clinical epidemiologic study of split hand/foot (central ray deficiency) of the Manitoba population identified a subset of patients who did not present with either typical or atypical split hand. Clinically, some patients presented with "mitten hand" syndactyly; the deficiency was not recognized before imaging. In this paper, we identify additional similarly affected literature cases, review existing classifications of split hand and syndactyly and attempt to classify these patients. This group presents a challenge for classification and genetic counseling. General classifications permit inclusion of patients with diverse phenotypes; however, details are overlooked. Osseous fusions and disorganization of osseous components complicate classification. Many of these patients had findings that overlapped different subtypes within existing classifications. This cohort highlights the importance of imaging patients with distal limb anomalies. An effective classification scheme should include relevant clinical and radiographic findings in order to assist clinicians following these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".