MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W577765822

Applying Supply Chain Logistics Technology to Improve International Border Crossing

2006· article· en· W577765822 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
E. C. Chang

Bibliographic record

VenuePROCEEDINGS OF THE 13th ITS WORLD CONGRESS, LONDON, 8-12 OCTOBER 2006 · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicOutsourcing and Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainBusinessInvestment (military)Competition (biology)Goods and servicesInternational tradeWork (physics)Industrial organizationEconomicsEconomyMarketingEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Government agencies in North America are in the process to increase efficiency through the facilitation of international trade. North America Freight Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a step in the right direction by the elimination of tariffs on goods originating in member countries. The current cross border freight movement has increased drastically that create significantly congestion around and near the North America Border area. There is an eminent need to increase the efficiency of the flows of these goods between the member nations. The major objectives are to eliminate barriers to trade in, and facilitate the cross-border movement of, goods and services between the territories of the interested parties, promote fair competition in the free trade area, and Increase substantially investment opportunities. Supply Chains Management (SCM) has become the businesses lifeline in the global market. The major components include (1) integrated information network, (2) logistic network that connecting all origin of supply/demand, and all trading partners, and (3) integrated inventory control and material flow that spans multiple organizations and operations. The system must work together to avoid waste, carry minimum amounts of inventory, and provide customer competitive satisfaction in the shortest cycle time. The impacts of well-organized supply chains can be quite dramatic. For example, in US, the logistics costs as a percentage of GDP declined from approximately 17% in 1980 to just over 10% in 1993 that mirrored the inflation decline over the same period. In a similar time frame (1983 to 1997), the value of inventory as a percentage of GDP fell from 24% to less than 17%. This paper describes the Supply Chain Management (SCM) analysis being made to improve cross border freight movements among Canada, Mexico, and United States. The process can save time, reduce distribution cost of freight, and enhance customer services. This work will result in a win-win situation for Customs Service, customs brokers manufacturers, customers, and shippers alike. Increased efficiency in the supply chain and information flows will result in reduced processing time and waiting time for freight movements, foster seamless border crossing freight movements, reduce distribution costs, and lower product costs for end customer at the global scale. For the covering abstract see ITRD E134653.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePROCEEDINGS OF THE 13th ITS WORLD CONGRESS, LONDON, 8-12 OCTOBER 2006Same topicOutsourcing and Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207