MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W577983221

Creating a transatlantic marketplace : government policies and business strategies

2005· book· en· W577983221 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michelle Egan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Union Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransatlantic relationsDiscretionGovernment (linguistics)Competition (biology)HegemonyLiberalizationInternational tradePolitical scienceCorporate governancePublic administrationEconomyPoliticsEconomicsManagementLawForeign policy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Introduction - Michelle Egan 2. The US-EU economic relationship - Hugo Paeman 3. Long-haul liberalisation: Will transatlantic air transport ever be deregulated? - Martin Staniland 4. Sole of discretion: Competition relations in the transatlantic marketplace - Chad Damro 5. Government-business strategies and transatlantic economic relations: Between hegemony and high technology - Johan Lembke 6. New issue-areas in the transatlantic relationship: E-commerce and the Safe Harbor arrangement - Henry Farrell 7. Regulating biotech foods: Government institutions and public reactions - Diahanna Post 8. Competing trade and regulatory strategies for the mutual recognition of conformity assessment in the transatlantic marketplace - Rebecca Steffenson 9. The EU - Canada dialogue: Trend-setting for rule-based global governance - Youri Devuyst Conclusion Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEuropean Union Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207