Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foreword, Sir Ghillean Prance (former Director of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew) Introduction and Background, R.J. Berry (University College London, UK) I. History of the Idea 1. Having Dominion: Genesis and the mastery of nature, Peter Harrison (Bond University, Western Australia) 2. The Concept of Stewardship, John Black (University of Edinburgh, UK). 3. Why St Francis?, Jan Boersema (Free University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 4. Environmental sensitivity and critiques of stewardship, Robin Attfield (Cardiff University, UK) 5. Human authority in creation, Richard Bauckham (University of St Andrews, UK) 6. A theology for the Earth, Joseph Sittler (University of Chicago, USA) II. Application and Criticism 7. The fallible concept of the stewardship of the Earth, Jim Lovelock (independent scientist) 8. Religion and the environment, Crispin Tickell (Director of the Climate Change Institute, Green College, Oxford, UK) 9. The significance of evolutionary theory for environmental ethics, Lisa Sideris (McGill University, USA) 10. Ethics and the environment, Chris Patten (European Commissioner) 11. The stewardship of creation, Alister McGrath (University of Oxford, UK) III. Theological Debate 12. Stewardship: a case study in environmental ethics, Clare Palmer (Lancaster University, UK) 13. Stewardship as a key to a theology of nature, Douglas Hall (McGill University, USA) 14. Partnership with nature according to the scripture: beyond the theology of stewardship, Paul Santmire (Akron, Ohio, USA) 15. Tensions in a stewardship paradigm, Bruce Reichenbach (Augsburg College, Minneapolis, USA) and Elving Anderson (University of Minnesota, USA) 16. To render praise: humanity in God's world, Murray Rae (King's College London, UK) 17. From ecological lament to a sustainable oikos, Anne Clifford (Duquesne University, USA) 18. Stewardship and its competitors: a spectrum of relationships between humans and the non-human creation, Chris Southgate (University of Exeter, UK) 19. The fellowship of all creation, Ruth Page (University of Edinburgh, UK) IV. Relevance 20. Caring for the Earth, Martin Holdgate (International Union for the Conservation of Nature). 21. Soil, stewardship and spirit in the era of chemical agriculture, Michael Northcott (University of Edinburgh, UK) 22. Sauce for the goose, Derek Osborn (UK Environmental Stakeholders Forum) 23. Sea stewards and the sabbath, Susan Bratton (Baylor University, USA) 24. Stewardship: responding appropriately to the consequences of human action in the world, Calvin DeWitt (University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA) 25. Preserving God's creation, Metropolitan John of Pergamon [Zizioulas] 26. Steward, Larry Rasmussen (Union Theological Seminary, USA) Conclusion, John Houghton (formerly Director of the Meteorological Office) Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.026 | 0.037 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.037 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.022 | 0.026 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.017 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".