MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Proteomic Profiling of Tyrosine Kinases as Pharmacological Endpoints for Targeted Cancer Therapy

2007· book-chapter· en· W57864847 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Moulay A. Alaoui‐Jamali, Devanand M. Pinto

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Breast Cancer Research AllianceCancer Research Society
KeywordsTargeted therapyTyrosine kinaseProfiling (computer programming)KinaseProteomicsCancer therapyComputational biologyCancer researchBioinformaticsMedicineBiologyCancerGeneSignal transductionInternal medicineBiochemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SummaryProtein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) and their substrates are emerging as attractive therapeutic targets and potential biomarkers for molecular classifications, prediction of clinical outcome and monitoring response to cancer treatments. The exciting move toward kinase-targeted therapy has brought new technical challenges in profiling protein kinase genes and proteins as surrogate clinical biomarkers, particularly in light of clinical data correlating specific mutations in PTKs with either sensitivity or resistance to targeted therapy. This chapter discusses the impact of mutations on protein conformation, protein phosphorylation, and drug response and the utility of proteomic technology to mine the phosphoproteome for PTK profiling and prediction of response to targeted therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.311
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchFrench-language works237,207