MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W578809198 · doi:10.15807/jorsj.49.174

BATCH SCHEDULING IN CUSTOMER-CENTRIC SUPPLY CHAINS(<Special Issue>Advanced Planning and Scheduling for Supply Chain Management)

2006· article· en· W578809198 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Operations Research Society of Japan · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupply chainComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Mathematical optimizationSupply chain managementFlow shop schedulingDynamic priority schedulingJob shop schedulingFair-share schedulingOperations researchScheduleMathematicsBusinessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supply chain scheduling is a new emerging area of research. We study batch arrival scheduling problems at the manufacturer in a multi-level customer-centric supply chain, where promised job due dates are considered constraints which must be satisfied. We analyze the tradeoff between inventory holding costs and batch delivery costs. We show that the problems are closely related to batch scheduling problems on a single machine with flow-time related objectives. We prove that minimizing the sum of total weighted flow time and delivery costs is strongly NP-hard. For the unweighted version of the problem, we present efficient solution algorithms both for single machine and assembly systems. We also develop a dynamic programming solution for minimizing the sum of maximum flow time and delivery costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it