MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W580667505

Le plateau de l'albatros : introduction à la géopoétique

2018· book· fr· W580667505 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kenneth White

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Andre Malraux declarait qu'apres les grandes affres politiques du XXe siecle, le XXIe siecle serait spirituel ou ne serait pas. Tout en analysant la situation historique a sa maniere, Kenneth White propose autre chose : une ouverture au monde, un renouvellement de l'expression sous toutes ses formes : un nouveau fondement culturel, pour lequel il a invente le concept et le terme de geopoetique. Cet essai examine ce concept des points de vue scientifique, philosophique et litteraire, suit quelques itineraires individuels (La Perouse, Humboldt), salut l'?uvre de quelques grands compagnons de route (Thoreau, Cendrars, Kazantzakis?) et deploie la premiere cartographie d'un (nouveau) monde, tout en situant les idees et les pratiques de la geopoetique dans notre contexte sociopolitique actuel. Kenneth White, ne en Ecosse, vit en France depuis 1967. Il est l'auteur d'une oeuvre feconde ecrite pour une part en anglais pour une autre en francais et a obtenu le prix Medicis etranger en 1983. Il est a l'origine du concept de nomadisme intellectuel et fonde l'Institut international de geopoetique en 1989. Au Mot et le reste il a publie La Route bleue, Les Cygnes sauvages, Les Vents de Vancouver, La Mer des lumieres, Derives, La Traversee des territoires, Au large de l'histoire, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical and Literary AnalysesFrench-language works237,207