MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W580883307

The effects of an aquatics exercise program on sit to stand mechanics, flexibility, and balance in a group of arthritic women

2001· article· en· W580883307 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nicole Elissa Szajcz

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)Balance (ability)Group (periodic table)Physical therapyMedicineMathematicsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arthritis is one of the most common chronic illnesses. It is an inflammatory condition that causes pain and stiffness in the joints. It presently affects approximately four million Canadians. As this illness progresses, it deteriorates the cartilage of a joint causing major limitation in activities of daily living due to decreases in strength, flexibility, and balance. The sit to stand movement is one of the most essential motor skills performed in daily life. This study was an attempt to find ways to improve functional ability within the arthritis population. The two purposes of the study was to examine the effects of an aquatics program on the mechanics of the sit-to-stand movement and on flexibility, balance, strength, and agility in arthritic patients. The aquatic program was based on the Arthritis Foundation YMCA Aquatic Program (AFYAP). (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesFrench-language works237,207