Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents a summary of the legal case entitled Lone Star Industries, Inc. versus Lafarge Corp. and Lafarge Canada, Inc. Lone Star manufactured approximately 500,000 railroad ties using a combination of crushed-rock aggregate, Type III moderate high-alkali cement, and manual steam curing. The cement was supplied by defendant, Lafarge. The railroad ties developed external cracking due to internal expansion. The dispute focussed on a disagreement between the parties' expert witnesses as to whether the cause of the expansion in the railroad ties was delayed ettringite formation (DEF) or alkali-silica reaction (ASR). The experts for the plaintiff argued that the cracking was caused by DEF, as a result of the chemical composition of the cement supplied by Lafarge. The experts for the defendant testified that the cracking was due instead to the steam curing methods used by the plaintiffs, which resulted in ASR in the cement. Ultimately a jury found for Lafarge on all Lone Star's claims except for the claim of breach of express warranty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it