MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W581241149

An Approach to Incorporate Uncertainty and Risk in Transportation Investment Decision Making: Detroit River International Crossing Case Study

2011· article· en· W581241149 on OpenAlex
Sabyasachee Mishra, Snehamay Khasnabis, Subrat Kumar Swain

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Board 90th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvestment (military)Risk analysis (engineering)Option valueEconomicsPolicy analysisBusinessActuarial scienceOperations researchEngineeringMicroeconomicsIncentive
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large scale transportation projects represent major investments devoted to the construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities over an extended period. Typically, these investments are irreversible in nature and require long-term commitment by the public at large relative to utilization, maintenance, and operation. Traditional economic analysis techniques used to evaluate the financial feasibility of such projects are based upon the assumption of deterministic future cash flows that are not subject to any uncertainty and risk. In reality, many of these projects are associated with significant uncertainties and risks stemming from lack of knowledge about future cost and benefit streams. There is a lack of comprehensive literature in addressing uncertainty and risk in transportation investment decision making. The authors present a framework for addressing uncertainty and risk for large scale transportation investments involving joint participation by the public and private entity. Demand, fare/toll, and demand responsive costs are considered in the uncertainty analysis. A bi-level programming is proposed, where the upper level constitutes the preference of the policy maker, and the lower level determines the user’s response to the policy. The uncertainty analysis provides economic feasibility of the transportation project. A set of relaxation policies is proposed to form various Ownership, Tenure, and Governance (OTG) strategies reflecting the nature and level of participation by the public and private entity. The uncertainty analysis output serves as input to the risk analysis. Monte Carlo Simulation is used to address risks for feasible policy options selected from uncertainty analysis. The concept of Value at Risk (VaR) is used to quantify risk. A methodology is proposed to integrate uncertainty and risk. The framework is tested on the proposed multi-billion dollar international river crossing entitled as the Detroit River International Crossing (DRIC) connecting the city of Detroit in the US and the city of Windsor in Canada. The combination of both uncertainty and risk reveals insights to the probable outcomes for a transportation infrastructure investment. This methodology can be used as a tool for transportation infrastructure investment decision making process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it