MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

EL MARCO JURÍDICO APLICABLE A LA TELEVISIÓN PÚBLICA EN CANADÁ

2008· article· es· W58124143 on OpenAlex
André Braën

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Vasca de Administración Pública / Herri-Arduralaritzarako Euskal Aldizkaria · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdministrative Law and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El marco jurídico aplicable a la televisión pública en Canadá así como su financiación han sufrido en los últimos tiempos profundas transformaciones. Este artículo explica el sistema de radiotelevisión pública en Canadá así como sus peculiaridades más significativas fruto de las especificidades del propio país (comunidades con distintas lenguas, la vasta extensión del territorio, la cercanía a los Estados Unidos). Kanadan telebista publikoari aplikatu dakiokeen esparru juridikoan, baita bere finantzaketan ere, aldaketa sakonak egon dira azken aldi honetan. Artikulu honek Kanadako irrati-telebista publikoaren sistema azaltzen du, eta baita ere herrialdearen berezitasunek (hizkuntza desberdinak dituzten komunitateak egoteak, lurraldearen handitasunak, Estatu Batuetatik gertu egoteak) sistema horri ematen dizkioten ezaugarri esanguratsuen. The legal framework of public television in Canada and its financing have been suffering deep transformations. This article explains the Canadian public broadcasting system together with its most significant peculiarities which are consequence of the uniquess of the country: communities with different languages, the vast extension of its territory, the proximity to the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it