Bibliographic record
Abstract
El marco jurídico aplicable a la televisión pública en Canadá así como su financiación han sufrido en los últimos tiempos profundas transformaciones. Este artículo explica el sistema de radiotelevisión pública en Canadá así como sus peculiaridades más significativas fruto de las especificidades del propio país (comunidades con distintas lenguas, la vasta extensión del territorio, la cercanía a los Estados Unidos). Kanadan telebista publikoari aplikatu dakiokeen esparru juridikoan, baita bere finantzaketan ere, aldaketa sakonak egon dira azken aldi honetan. Artikulu honek Kanadako irrati-telebista publikoaren sistema azaltzen du, eta baita ere herrialdearen berezitasunek (hizkuntza desberdinak dituzten komunitateak egoteak, lurraldearen handitasunak, Estatu Batuetatik gertu egoteak) sistema horri ematen dizkioten ezaugarri esanguratsuen. The legal framework of public television in Canada and its financing have been suffering deep transformations. This article explains the Canadian public broadcasting system together with its most significant peculiarities which are consequence of the uniquess of the country: communities with different languages, the vast extension of its territory, the proximity to the United States.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".