Osborne Street Bridge Rehabilitation and Widening
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Situated in the central part of Winnipeg (Manitoba, Canada), the Osborne Street Bridge is a major river crossing comprised of twin bridges spanning over the Assiniboine River. This bridge is one of Manitoba's busiest routes for vehicle, cyclist, and pedestrian traffic. The City of Winnipeg (City) identified that the bridge was in need of rehabilitation to extend its remaining service life and to strengthen the bridge for current design loads. The rehabilitation works also needed to improve Active Transportation (AT) across the bridge and within the project limits. In 2009, Tetra Tech WEI Inc. (Tetra Tech) consulting team was retained by the City to provide conceptual and preliminary engineering, detailed design, and construction services for this project. Rehabilitation works on the bridge included partial depth deck replacement, bearings and expansion joint replacement, and widening of the deck overhangs to accommodate wider sidewalks, and 1.8 m shoulders for cyclists. A comprehensive public consultation program was implemented that also included a Neighbourhood Advisory Committee (NAC). NAC committee members participated as representatives of a broader constituency to work together with the design team by providing input, identifying issues, and discussing reasonable options to enhance the project and help mitigate impacts during construction. Public art was also integrated in the bridge design to emphasize the eclectic nature of the neighborhood and represent its rich history. For the covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record number 201310RT334E.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".