From lowlands to high skies : a multilevel jurisdictional approach towards air law : essays in honour of John Balfour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preface Sovereignty in the Sky Lauren Payne About John Balfour Curriculum Vitae List of Abbreviations Part A Public Air Law 1 A Substantive and Procedural Critique of the U.S. Open Skies Policy Brian F. Havel 2 New Rules on Concordato Preventivo (Composition with Creditors) in Italian Law and their Repercussions on Aviation Claims Anna Masutti 3 The Technical Defragmentation of Air Navigation Services - The Legal Challenges of Virtualisation Francis Schubert 4 Taxes and Charges under the Chicago Convention Mark Bisset 5 Aircraft Registration: Challenges under German Law P. Nikolai Ehlers 6 Article 83bis (Revisited):Transfer of Safety Oversight Responsibilities Seen from a European Regulator's Perspective Frank Manuhutu 7 How to Sell Tickets - IATA's New Distribution Capability (NDC): A New Model? Mia Wouters Part B EU Air Law 1 Regulatory Air Transport Developments in the European Union Peter Haanappel 2 Regulation 261/2004 - Passengers' Right to Compensation in Case of Flight Delay. Looking for a Fair Balance of Interests. The Role of the Court of Justice of the EU and the Risk to Waste a Chance for Reform Laura Pierallini 3 Locked Out of Heaven: The Air Greenland Case and Extraordinary Circumstances Morten Lundqvist Jakobsen and Jacob Skude Rasmussen 4 Cooperative Agreements in the Aviation Sector and EU Competition Law Philippe Ruttley and Solange Leandro 5 Disproportionate Jurisprudence: The CJEU's Approach to Proportionality in Regulation 261/2004 Alan Meneghetti and Thomas van der Wijngaart 6 Portugal and the New Age of Discovery - Navigating the New World of Sale, Acquisition and Privatization via the Waters of Competition Geoffrey Graham 7 John Balfour's Contribution to IATA Leadership in the Airline Industry Lorne Clark Part C Private Air Law 1 International and National Aviation Rules Versus Consumer Protection Regulations: A Comparative Report on the Position of Latin American Countries in Relation to EU Regulation 261/2004 Elizabeth Freidenberg 2 Aerial Conflicts of Law: An Analysis of Conflicts of Law Rules as Applied to Aircraft Berend Crans 3 Scratching Beneath the Surface: The Unlawful Interference Convention 2009 Michael Gill 4 Climbing Every Mountain: A History of Change, Transition and the Rise of Consumerism in the Airline Industry Viewed from the Insurance Perspective Philip Chrystal 5 Jurisdiction under and Exclusivity of Private International Air Law Agreements on Air Carrier Liability: The Case of Airbus versus Armavia Airlines (2013) Pablo Mendes de Leon 6 The Malaise Affecting the Global Uniform Effectiveness of the Montreal Convention, 1999 (MC99) George N. Tompkins Jr. .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".