MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W582160366

MOVABLE BARRIERS FOR HIGH-TRAFFIC WORK: SAFETY ON THE HIGHWAY

2000· article· en· W582160366 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D B Rathbone

Bibliographic record

VenuePublic works · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation Safety and Impact Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransport engineeringWork (physics)Work zoneFlexibility (engineering)Equity (law)EngineeringTraffic flow (computer networking)Computer scienceComputer security
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Work zones in the U.S. result in a large number of fatalities, injuries, and other accidents each year. The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) specifically addresses this problem and the need to provide positive protection in work zones while providing adequate work space and minimizing traffic delays. This article discusses the implementation by many jurisdictions in the U.S. and Canada of Movable Barrier Technology (MBT) to improve safety, capacity, and efficiency during recent reconstruction projects. MBT is a type of positive separation technology that has the ability to provide positive protection continuously both to road users and construction workers while responding to traffic flow conditions and construction needs. MBT's flexibility allows it to be moved quickly and safety to open and close traffic lanes as required by varying work zone activities and traffic volumes. Design and construction of MBT systems, examples of successful use in various locations, and the minimal impact on lane closures and other benefits of MBT are described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublic worksSame topicTransportation Safety and Impact AnalysisFrench-language works237,207