Decision Control In Management Science Essays In Honor Of Alain Haurie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preface. Contributing Authors. Part I: Dynamical Systems and Optimization. 1. Time, Risk and Conflicts A. Haurie. 2. Jump Linear System with Time-Delay: Stability, Stabilization, HINFINITY Control and Their Robustness E.K. Boukas, Z.K. Liu. 3. On Impulsive Ordinary and Delay Differential Equations F. Dubeau, et al. 4. On Direct Extremization of a Class of Integrals G. Leitmann. 5. On Optimal Policies of Multichain Finite State Compact Action Markov Decision Processes A. Leizarowitz. 6. A Bilevel Programming Approach to Optimal Price Setting P. Marcotte, G. Savard. Part II: Energy and Environmental Modeling. 7. Swiss Policy Options to Curb CO2 Emissions O. Bahn. 8. Hydro-Quebec Reservoir Management with Wind Energy - The Modelling Approach G. Lafrance, et al. 9. Using Advanced Technology-Rich Models for Regional and Global Economic Analysis of GHG Mitigation R. Loulou, A. Kanudia. Part III: Finance and Economics. 10. Partial Hedging for Options Based on Extreme Values and Passage Times H. Ben Ameur, et al. 11. A Continuous Minimax Problem and its Application to Inflation Targeting B. Rustem, et al. 12. Equilibrium Asset Price Dynamics with Holding-term Switching D.W.K. Yeung. Part IV: Production and Industrial Systems. 13. Average-Cost Optimality of a Base-Stock Policy for a Multi-Product Inventory Model with Limited Storage D. Beyer, et al. 14. Industrial Applications of the Variable Neighborhood Search Metaheuristic P. Jansen, N.Mladenovic. 15. Two Approximations as a Basis for the Optimization of Production in Unreliable Markovian Long Transfer Lines J. Mbihi, et al. 16. An Industrial Cutting Stock Problem L. Muller Nicoletti, et al. 17. Lotstreaming Single Product in 3-Machine No-Wait Flow-Shops E. Wagneur. Part V: Game Theory. 18. Uniqueness of Normalized Nash Equilibrium for a Class of Games with Strategies in Banach Spaces D.A. Carlson. 19. Time Consistency in Cooperative Differential Games S. Jorgensen, G. Zaccour. 20. Approximate Solutions and a-Well-Posedness for Variational Inequalities and Nash Equilibria M.B. Lignola, J. Morgan. 21. Government and Opposition Weighted Majority Games: An Analysis of the Italian Political Situation G. Ricci, et al. 22. Horizontal Strategic Interactions in Franchising S.P. Sigue. List of publications of Professor Alain Haurie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".