La pintura aragonesa de la segona meitat del segle XV relacionada amb l’escola catalana: dues vies creatives a examen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La historiografia classica va considerar que, cap a mitjan segle XV, influencies foranes, vehiculades principalment per Jaume Huguet i Bartolome Bermejo, van capgirar el curs de la pintura aragonesa, que llavors vivia els darrers moments del gotic internacional i comencava a assumir alguns elements del nou realisme flamenc. Aquesta divisio de l’escola pictorica aragonesa de la segona meitat del segle XV en dos grans corrents, un dels quals estretament vinculat al context catala, ha estat avaluada i matisada per diversos historiadors al llarg dels darrers anys, i en aquesta linia s’inscriu tambe aquesta tesi. A la primera part es revisa la importancia del darrer gotic internacional aragones en la formacio dels pintors de la segona meitat del segle XV i la seva capacitat per assumir algunes propostes del nou realisme flamenc, principalment a traves de la figura del Mestre de Riglos i la seva connexio amb un dels mestres etiquetats tradicionalment com a deixebles d’Huguet, Pere Garcia de Benavarri. D’altra banda, propostes recents recuperen per al cataleg d’un artista aragones i el seu cercle un grup de pintures adscrites anteriorment a una hipotetica etapa juvenil de Jaume Huguet que hauria transcorregut a l’Arago. A la segona part de la tesis es parteix d’aquest nou punt de vista per a revisar el cataleg d’alguns mestres actius a la segona meitat del segle XV, considerats tradicionalment huguetians. S’estudia la figura del Mestre de Sant Jordi i la princesa, Tomas Giner, Arnau de Castelnou, el Mestre de sant Bartomeu, el Grup de Morata i el Mestre de Cervera de la Canada, entre d’altres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".