Religions et solidarités dans l’Espagne moderne. Réflexions à partir de l’oeuvre de R. Diaz-Salazar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pour bon nombre d'observateurs, de l'intérieur et de l'extérieur, l'Espagne semble constituer un cas extrême d'identification entre le catholicisme et la nation. Fondé sur deux ouvrages récents fort documentés de M. Diaz-Salazar, professeur de l'Université Complutense de Madrid, cet article tente de cerner les solidarités qui lient le catholicisme et les forces vives de l'Espagne moderne en trois moments de son histoire: le début du siècle, le triomphe du national-catholicisme, le retour de la société pluraliste et sécularisée. Cette analyse pose une question fondamentale et donne lieu à l'esquisse d'une théorie socioreligiologique du sacré comme piste privilégiée de recherche explicative. Il est à espérer que l'étude approfondie de l'évolution sociale, politique et religieuse du catholicisme à l'intérieur d'une société moderne puisse nous aider à mieux situer les solidarités réelles que vivent les hommes et les femmes - ici et ailleurs - en cette fin du siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".