Innovative Techniken im Dienst fuer einen sicheren und effektiven Verkehrsablauf im Winter - Erfahrungen vom XIII. Internationalen Winterdienst-Kongress in Quebec / Innovative technologies for a safe and effective traffic flow in winter - Experiences from the XIII. International Winter Road Congress in Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Im Februar 2010 fand der XIII. Internationale Strassenwinterdienst-Kongress des Welt-Strassenverbandes (PIARC) in Quebec (Kanada) statt. Traditionell wurde bei diesem in vierjaehrigem Turnus durchgefuehrten Kongress ein umfangreiches Vortragsprogramm geboten, begleitet von einer grossen Ausstellung, Felddemonstrationen und technischen Exkursionen. Ebenfalls zur Tradition gehoert, dass Erfahrungen und neueste Entwicklungen im gesamten Feld des Winterdienstes zwischen den Teilnehmern aus allen Teilen der Erde, in denen Winterdienst praktiziert wird, auf hoechstem Niveau ausgetauscht werden. Der Kongress leistet damit einen wesentlichen Beitrag zur Weiterentwicklung des Winterdienstes, die derzeit mit grossen Schritten vorangeht. Insbesondere die Nutzung modernster Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik fuer den Winterdienst ist hierbei von grosser Bedeutung, aber auch die Weiterentwicklung der Streutechnik und der Winterdienstgeraete. Der Beitrag berichtet von dem Kongress, wobei vor allem die aus deutscher Sicht wesentlichen Neuerungen und Entwicklungen aufgezeigt werden. (A) ABSTRACT IN ENGLISH: Traditionally there was a comprehensive programme of technical presentations, combined with a large exhibition, field demonstrations and technical visits in the area. On the Winter Road Congress which takes place every 4 years experts of countries with winter climate from all over the world meet and exchange experiences and newest developments in the field of winter maintenance on a high level. So the congress is very conductive to the further development of winter maintenance which is ongoing in great steps. Especially the use of newest communication technology but also the development of spreading techniques and winter maintenance equipment is very important. The paper gives a report from the Congress, especially dealing with the most important developments from German view. (A)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".