Early childhood services : theory, policy and practice
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: theory, policy and practice in early childhood services. Part 1 How do children learn - early childhood services in a global context: towards a global paradigm for research into early childhood two sides of an eagles feather - University of Victoria partnerships with Canadian first nations communities. Part 2 What should children learn - approaches to the curriculum: Te Whariki - curriculum voices the future of infant education. Part 3 Where should children learn - space and segregation: the Frankfurt kindergartens. Part 4 Who should help children learn - a natural or an unnatural profession: the parameters of training is working with young children a good job?. Part 5 Children as participants: discipline and normalization in the nursery - the Foucaultian gaze what is the use of children's play - preparation or social participation? the rights of young children. Part 6 Research and practice: everything is a beginning and everything is dangerous - some reflections on the Reggio Emilia experience research and practice - is there a dialogue?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it