Host City Olympic Transportation Plan (HCOTP) for the 2010 Winter Games
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games are the biggest events to occur in the history of the City of Vancouver, with more than a quarter of a million visitors and 10,000 media expected in the City during Games time. This will mean a significant increase in activity on city streets (30% more trips to Downtown), while dealing with a reduced road capacity in areas surrounding Games venues (20% less road capacity to Downtown). To manage Games time conditions, the City developed a Host City Olympic Transportation Plan (HCOTP). The HCOTP includes measures designed to allow local businesses to operate and residents to get where they need to go while allowing athletes, officials, and the media to reliably travel to Games events. The City is working closely with its transportation partners including the Vancouver Organizing Committee for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (VANOC), BC Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, TransLink, BC Transit, and the Vancouver 2010 Integrated Security Unit (VISU), on an integrated Games time plan for getting around the region in 2010. A comprehensive integrated transportation plan was released in March 2009. This paper describes the Host City's Olympic Transportation Plan (HCOTP) and its relationship to the broader 2010 Winter Games integrated transportation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".