MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W586833843

Leadership team coaching in practice : developing high-performing teams

2014· book· en· W586833843 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Hawkins

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCoaching Methods and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoachingManagementPsychologyHoganSociologyPsychotherapist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter - 01: Introduction: High-performing teams - the latest research and development - Peter Hawkins Chapter - 02: What are leadership team coaching and systemic team coaching? - Peter Hawkins Chapter - 03: Learning from case studies and an overview of published case studies - Peter Hawkins, Catherine Carr and Jacqueline Peters Chapter - 04: Coaching the commissioning and clarifying: A case study of a professional services leadership team - Hilary Lines Chapter - 05: Coaching the co-creating within the team: Two case studies from Canada - Catherine Carr and Jacqueline Peters Chapter - 06: Coaching the connecting between a new CEO, her leadership team and the wider middle management in a UK National Health Service organization - Jacqui Scholes-Rhodes and Angela McNab Chapter - 07: Coaching the team working with its core learning - Sue Coyne and Judith Nicol Chapter - 08: Team coaching as part of organizational transformation: A case study of Finnair - David Jarrett Chapter - 09: Team coaching for organizational learning and innovation: A case study of an Australian pharmaceutical subsidiary - Padraig O'Sullivan and Carole Field Chapter - 10: Inter-team coaching: From team coaching to organizational transformation at Yeovil Hospital Foundation Trust - Peter Hawkins and Gavin Boyle Chapter - 11: Evaluation and assessment of teams and team coaching - Peter Hawkins Chapter - 12: Coaching the board: How coaching boards is different from coaching executive teams, with case examples from the private, public and voluntary sectors - Peter Hawkins and Alison Hogan Chapter - 13: Embodied approaches to team coaching - Peter Hawkins and David Presswell Chapter - 14: Developing the personal core capacities for systemic team coaching - Peter Hawkins Chapter - 15: Training systemic team coaches - Peter Hawkins and John Leary-Joyce Chapter - 16: Team coaching - where next? - Peter Hawkins

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoaching Methods and ImpactFrench-language works237,207