Bibliographic record
Abstract
Qui prend soin des plus vulnérables ? Sur quelles épaules repose le plus massivement la part altruiste de nos sociétés ? Les femmes ont toujours été au cœur des traditions de secours aux pauvres, d’accueil des immigrants et des réfugiés, d’aide aux mères et aux enfants. Ces rôles de solidarité, parce qu’associés au foyer et à la religion, leur ont permis d’agir dans une sphère publique qui leur était par ailleurs largement interdite. Dans la première moitié du XXe siècle, l’activité philanthropique organisée a été un moteur essentiel de l’accession des femmes aux pleins droits politiques. Ce livre s’attache à faire l’histoire de trois grandes associations au Québec : la Fédération nationale Saint-Jean-Baptiste, la Young Women’s Christian Association (YWCA) et le National Council of Jewish Women. Yolande Cohen montre que les femmes qui s’y sont engagées ont apporté une contribution majeure et encore largement ignorée à l’élaboration des politiques sociales canadiennes et québécoises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".