Ethnicity and human rights in Canada : a human rights perspective on ethnicity, racism, and systemic inequality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tables and Boxes Acknowledgements Preface Introduction Conceptualizing the Human Rights Approach: Guidelines from International Human Rights Instruments Chapter 1 Human Unity and Cultural Diversity: The Janus-faced Underpinnings of Ethnicity, Human Rights, and Racism Chapter 2 The Anatomy of Racism: Key Concepts behind the Invalidation of Racial-Ethnic Difference Chapter 3 Social Stratification: Human Rights Violations and the Social Construction of Ethnic and Other Minorities Chapter 4 The Vertical Ethnic Mosaic: The Canadian System of Racial-Ethnic Stratification Chapter 5 Ethnicity, Ethnocultural Distinctiveness, and Collective Rights Claims Chapter 6 Ethnic Integration and Human Rights: Models and Government Policies of Incorporation of Immigrant and Aboriginal Minorities Chapter 7 Minority Protest Movements: The Mobilization of Ethnicity in Pursuit of Protection for Minority Rights Chapter 8 The Legal Framework for Protection of Minority Rights in Canada: Human Rights Statues Chapter 9 The Legal Framework for Protection of Minority Rights in Canada: The Canadian Constitution and Its Charter of Rights and Freedoms Further Readings Glossary Notes References Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.025 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".