Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Notes on Contributors. References to the Threatise, Abstract, and Enquiries. Editor's Introduction. Part I: Formulation, Reception and Scope of the Treatise:. 1. The Treatise: Composition, Reception and Response: John Wright (Central Michigan University). 2. Hume's Other Writings:Wade Robison (Rochester Institute of Technology). Part II: The Understanding:. 3. Impressions and Ideas: Janet Broughton (University of California, Berkeley). 4. Space and Time: Lorne Falkenstein (University of Western Ontario). 5. Belief, Probability, Normativity: William Edward Morris (Illinois Wesleyan University). 6. Causation: Abraham Sesshu Roth (University of Illinois at Chicago). 7. Identity, Continued Existence, and the External World: Don Baxter (University of Connecticut). 8. Personal Identity and the Sceptical System of Philosophy: Corliss Gayda Swain (St. Olaf College). 9. Hume's Conclusions in 'Conclusion of this Book': Don Garrett (New York University). Part III: The Passions:. 10. The Powers and Mechanisms of the Passions: Lilli Alanen (Uppsala University). 11. Hume's and Extraordinary Account of the Passions: Jane McIntyre (Cleveland State University). 12. Liberty, Necessity and the Will: Tony Pitson (University of Stirling). Part IV: Morals:. 13. Reason, Passion and the Influencing Motives of the Will: Mike Karlsson (University of Iceland). 14. Hume's Artificial and Natural Virtues: Rachel Cohon (University at Albany, State University of New York). 15. Virtue and the Evaluation of Character: Jacqueline Taylor (University of San Francisco). Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it