MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W587900359 · doi:10.4324/9781315874067-7

Equality in Asia-Pacific : reality or a contradiction in terms?

2008· book· en· W587900359 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Phil C.W. Chan, Desmond Tutu

Bibliographic record

VenueRoutledge eBooks · 2008
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicConflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContradictionGender studiesChinaSociologyConstitutionalismPolitical scienceColonialismHuman sexualitySexual orientationLawDemocracyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Equality in Asia-Pacific: Reality or a Contradiction in Terms? - An Introduction 2. What's in a Name? Bisexuality, Transnational Sexuality Studies and Western Colonial Legacies 3. Same-Sex Marriage/Constitutionalism and their Centrality to Equality Rights in Hong Kong: A Comparative-Socio-Legal Appraisal 4. Changing Times, Changing Minds, Changing Laws - Sexual Orientation and New Zealand Law, 1960 to 2005 5. The Same-Sex Marriage Debate in Australia 6. Non-Governmental Organising for Gender Equality in China - Joining a Global Emancipatory Epistemic Community 7. On China's Slow Boat to Women's Rights: Revisions to the Women's Protection Law, 2005 8. Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Korea by Gender, Socioeconomic Background, and Family Structure 9. Official Languages and Bilingualism in the Courtroom: Hong Kong, Canada, the Republic of Ireland, and International Law 10. Constitutionalising Affirmative Action in the Fiji Islands

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.016
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoutledge eBooksSame topicConflict of Laws and JurisdictionFrench-language works237,207