Northern Ireland and the divided world : the Northern Ireland conflict and the Good Friday Agreement in comparative perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The Comparable Northern Ireland PART ONE: GENERAL AND THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES 2. Northern Ireland: Consociation or Social Transformation? 3. Comparative Political Science and the British-Irish Agreement 4. Northern Ireland's Agreement: Clear, Consociational and Risky 5. Northern Ireland, Civic Nationalism and the Good Friday Agreement 6. Unsung Heroes? The role of peace and conflict resolution organisations in the Northern Ireland conflict PART TWO: COMPARATIVE CASE-STUDIES 7. From Conflict to Agreement in Northern Ireland: Lessons from Europe 8. Northern Ireland and the Basque Country 9. How do Consociational Systems begin - Canada and Northern Ireland in Historical perspective 10. Northern Ireland and Island Status 11. Taking the Gun out of Politics: Conflict Transformation in Northern Ireland and Lebanon' 12. Making Peace in South Africa and Northern Ireland 13. The Tenability of Partition as a Mode of Conflict-Regulation: Comparing Ireland with Palestine/Land of Israel
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".