Bibliographic record
Abstract
This comprehensive review, prepared by 24 experts, many of whom are pioneers of subject, brings together in one place over 40 years of research in this unique publication. This book will assist R & D specialists, research chemists, chemical engineers or process managers harnessing periodic operations to improve their process plant performance. Periodic Operation of Reactors covers process fundamentals, research equipment and methods and provides the state of for periodic operation of many industrially important catalytic reactions. Emphasis is on experimental results, modeling and simulation. Combined reaction and separation are dealt with, including simulated moving bed chromatographic, pressure and temperature swing and circulating bed reactors. Thus, Periodic Operation of Reactors offers readers a single comprehensive source for broad and diverse new subject. This exciting new publication is a must have for any professional working in chemical process research and development. Key features: provides only comprehensive reference on fundamentals, development and applications of periodic reactor operation, using contributions from research pioneers. This authoritative reference focuses on applications helping readers to use this book to deliver results in their own work. Complete literature references will be an invaluable assistance for readers collecting data and models from past research. About editors: Peter L. Silveston is a Distinguished Professor Emeritus at University of Waterloo in Canada. Professor Silveston has authored or co-authored three previous books on reactor engineering topics as well as close to 300 research publications. He is a graduate of M.I.T. and Technical University of Munich (Germany). Robert Hudgins is a Professor Emeritus at University of Waterloo. His research interests are reactor engineering, specifically periodic operation of catalytic reactors, and he has about 250 research publications. He is a graduate of University of Toronto and Princeton University. Feature: a comprehensive reference on fundamentals, development and applications of periodic operation. Benefit: provides readers with a single comprehensive source for this extremely broad and diverse subject. Feature: contributors and editors include pioneers of subject as well as leading researchers in field. Benefit: has authority and experience of leading players in field. Feature: covers both fundamentals and state of art for each operation scenario, and brings all types of periodic operation together in a single volume. Benefit: provides a succinct reference to most important applications in filed, allowing readers to understand how to apply techniques or technologies to their own situation. Feature: discussion is focused on experimental results rather than theoretical ones; provides a rich source of experimental data, plus process models. Benefit: applied approach that is geared helping practicing engineers and researchers solve problems. Feature: accompanying website with modelling data. Benefit: engineers can engage with experimental and actual performance data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.068 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".