The long way home : the meanings and values of repatriation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acknowledgements Introduction Paul Turnbull PART I: ANCESTORS, NOT SPECIMENS Chapter 1. The Meanings and Values of Repatriation Henry Atkinson Chapter 2. Repatriating Our Ancestors: Who Will Speak for the Dead? Franchesca Cubillo PART II: REPATRIATION IN LAW AND POLICY Chapter 3. Museums, Ethics and Human Remains in England: Recent Developments and Implications for the Future Liz Bell Chapter 4. Legal Impediments to the Repatriation of Cultural Objects to Indigenous Peoples Kathryn Whitby-Last Chapter 5. Parks Canada's Policies that Guide the Repatriation of Human Remains and Objects Virginia Myles PART III: THE ETHICS AND CULTURAL IMPLICATIONS OF REPATRIATION Chapter 6. What Might an Anthropology of Cultural Property Look Like? Martin Skrydstrup Chapter 7. Repatriation and the Concept of Inalienable Possession Elizabeth Burns Coleman Chapter 8. Consigned to Oblivion: People and Things Forgotten in the Creation of Australia John Morton PART IV: REPATRIATION AND THE HISTORY OF SCIENTIFIC COLLECTING OF INDIGENOUS REMAINS Chapter 9. The Vermillion Accord and the Significance of the History of the Scientific Procurement and Use of Indigenous Australian Bodily Remains Paul Turnbull Chapter 10. Eric Mjoberg and the Rhetorics of Human Remains Claes Hallgren PART V: MUSEUMS, INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND REPATRIATION Chapter 11. Scientific Knowledge and Rights in Skeletal Remains - Dilemmas in the Curation of 'Other' People's Bones Howard Morphy Chapter 12. Despatches From The Front Line? Museum Experiences in Applied Repatriation Michael Pickering Chapter 13. 'You Keep It - We are Christians Here': Repatriation of the Secret Sacred Where Indigenous World-views Have Changed Kim Akerman Chapter 14. The First 'Stolen Generations': Repatriation and Reburial in Ngarrindjeri Ruwe (country) Steve Hemming and Chris Wilson Notes on Contributors References Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.041 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.016 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".