MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W590135043

C-TRAIN IS STILL INNOVATING

2003· article· en· W590135043 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julian Wolinsky

Bibliographic record

VenueRailway gazette international · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTransport and Economic Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransit (satellite)Transport engineeringPlan (archaeology)PaymentPort (circuit theory)Line (geometry)TelecommunicationsEngineeringPublic transportGeographyBusinessArchaeologyFinanceElectrical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plans to extend Calgary's C-Train light rail network in Canada with a 2.7 km extension and new station at Dalhousie are described. The existing network carries 30 million passengers a year on a 32 km network with 33 stations. The history of the network is outlined. The three-arm network is operated as two lines and fare collection is by proof-of-payment. Further extensions are included in Calgary Transit's 20-year strategic plan. These include extensions between Fish Creek-Lacombe to Somerset-Brindlewood Station and Whitehorn to McKnight Westwinds. Calgary Transit is also developing plans for a new Southest line serving Ogden, Douglasdale, McKenzie Towne and Cranston. Calgary has used a fleet of Duewag U2 articulated vehicles and Siemens Transportation Systems SE160s. The cars are equipped for operation in cold climates. Plans for improvements to the city centre transit corridor are outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1140.051

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRailway gazette internationalSame topicTransport and Economic PoliciesFrench-language works237,207