Bibliographic record
Abstract
This volume presents ninety lieder and other vocal compositions by a neglected figure, Otto Dresel (1826–90), reflecting the life of a composer with German origins and an American émigré experience. A student of Liszt, Schumann, and Mendelssohn, Dresel came to America in 1848. For a quarter century, Dresel—once known as the “musical conscience of Boston”—held critical and intellectual sway in that city's musical matters, along with his close friend John Sullivan Dwight. He functioned as composer laureate to the literary community of mid-nineteenth-century Boston: Longfellow, Holmes, Child, Howe, and Kemble were among the poets who turned to him to set their words to music. As Dresel released few compositions to publishers during his lifetime, most of the music presented here appears for the first time. The edition includes notes on the (often elusive) sources of his texts and reviews from nineteenth-century journals, which trace the reception of his music. An additional feature is the presentation of the original and revised versions of lieder that Dresel published at different times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.242 | 0.112 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".