Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis son entrée en vigueur en 1994, l’ALÉNA continue de soulever des questions quant à son applicabilité aux ressources en eau douce de ses parties, le Canada, les États-Unis et le Mexique. La principale critique veut que l’ALÉNA soit susceptible d’attribuer le statut de produit à l’eau douce. Le texte de l’ALÉNA ne semble pas interdire la marchandisation de l’eau douce, et la Déclaration conjointe de 1993 sur la non-applicabilité de l’ALÉNA à l’eau, formulée par les gouvernements du Canada, des États-Unis et du Mexique, ne permet pas non plus d’empêcher une telle éventualité, que ce soit en raison de sa formulation, de son contenu ou de son statut juridique. Les pressions visant à permettre une marchandisation de l’eau sont puissantes. Or, la marchandisation de l’eau douce comporte des conséquences négatives qu’il importe de prendre en considération et de présenter dans le cadre de ce mémoire de maîtrise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".