MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W590637993

LESSONS FROM CALGARY

2001· article· en· W590637993 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V Wilkins

Bibliographic record

VenueMass transit · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrban sprawlDowntownTransit (satellite)Square (algebra)Traffic congestionGeographyPublic transportGovernment (linguistics)PopulationTransport engineeringBusinessUrban planningEnvironmental planningEngineeringArchaeologyCivil engineeringSociologyDemography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The population of Calgary, Alberta has risen from 400,000 in 1971 to 860.000 today, and every day 50 more peop0le move to the city, and with them come 25 cars. There is a concentration of 102,000 employees, 12,000 residents and 32.2 million square feet of office space in a 1.4 square mile area in downtown Calgary. The city relies heavily on transit to help curb congestion and sprawl. The article examines the highly effective way that Calgary Transit and its parent city government have demonstrated their grasp of the fact that transit must play a highly effective role in controlling sprawl and maintaining the health of the urban core.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMass transitSame topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207