Gender, Diversity and Trade Unions: International Perspectives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Tackling Gender, Diversity and Trade Union Democracy: A World Wide Project 2. The Equity Project in Canadian Unions: Confronting the Challenge of Restructuring and Globalization 3. Learning to Embrace the Differences Within: Class, Gender and Diversity in Sweden's Peak Trade Union Body, the LO 4. Trade Unions, Segmentation and Diversity: the Organising Dilemmas in Malaysia 5. Trade Unions and Women's Autonomy: Organizational Strategies of Women Workers in India 6. From Unintended to Undecided Feminism? Italian Labour's Changing and Singular Ambiguites 7. Changing Gender Relations in German Trade Unions: from 'Workers Patriarchy' to Gender Democracy 8. Gender, Diversity and Mobilization in UK Trade Unions 9. Professional and Highly Qualified Women in Two Contrasting Unions 10. Women in the Labour Movement: Perceptions of Gender Democracy in South African Trade Unions 11. On the Edge of Equality: Working Women and the US Labour Movement 12. Organized Labour and Sexual Diversity Union Activism in Canada 13. Sexual Politics in (Australian) Labour Movements 14. Masculinities and Emotion Work in Trade Unions
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".