Pharmacokinetic comparison of a delayed-release combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrocholoride (Diclectin) and oral solutions of these drugs in healthy women of childbearing age.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The delayed-release combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride was the most commonly used antiemetic (Bendectin) approved by FDA for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) until its removal of the market in 1983. The drug is widely used today in Canada (Diclectin). The pharmacokinetics of Diclectin has never been described in humans. OBJECTIVES: To compare the pharmacokinetics of Diclectin to oral solutions of its two components. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A randomized, cross over, open label design, comparing the pharmacokinetics of Diclectin to those of the oral solutions of the two components in 18 healthy adult, non pregnant women of childbearing age. RESULTS: Diclectin exhibited similar oral bioavailability to those of the oral solutions. In contrast, the time-to-peak, (Tmax), reflecting the rate of absorption, was 3-6 times longer for the two components of the delayed-release drug confirming its delayed-release characteristics. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic profile of Diclectin well explains its documented delayed efficacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".