The welfare of food : the rights and responsibilities in a changing world
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preface. 1 Joined--up Food Policy? The Trials of Governance, Public Policy and the Food System (David Barling, Tim Lang and Martin Caraher). 2 Patenting Our Future: Intellectual Property Rights and the Global Food System (Geoff Tansey). 3 The Evolution of Food Safety Institutions in the UK, EU and Codex Alimentarius (Eric Millstone and Patrick van Zwanenberg) 4 Food Safety and Consumers: Construction of Choice and Risk (Alizon Draper and Judith Green). 5 Food security: Rights, Livelihoods and the World Food Summit--Five Years Later (Karim Hussein). 6 Food Banks and Food Security: Welfare Reform, Human Rights and Social Policy. Lessons From Canada? (Graham Riches). 7 Food Aid in Complex Emergencies: Lessons From Sudan (Elizabeth Ojaba, Anne Itto Leonardo and Margaret Itto Leonardo). 8 School Meals Policy: The Problem With Governing Children (Ulla Gustafsson). 9 Food and Poverty in Britain: Rights and Responsibilities (Elizabeth Dowler). Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".