MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W593254196

后殖民主义、民族主义与爱尔兰戏剧——休恩·理查兹访谈录

2005· article· zh· W593254196 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
张平功

Bibliographic record

Venue当代外国文学 · 2005
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(Irish Studies Review) 资深编委.他是英国爱尔兰研究学会创始成员之一,现任学会学术部主任,国际爱尔兰文学研究联合会欧洲代表.他在(Modern Drama),(Theatre Research International),(Irish Review),(Irish Studies Review),(Literature and History),(Irish University Review),(Canadian Journal of Irish Studies),(History Workshop Journal)和法国(Etudes Irelandaises)等刊物发表爱尔兰文学与戏剧论文几十篇,多次应邀在德国、法国、瑞典等国讲学.他主持编辑的作为久负盛名的 剑桥文学指南系列丛书的一种,2004年由剑桥大学出版社出版发行.我于2004年10月12日,即在他的新作出版之际对他进行了录音采访.采访内容主要集中在爱尔兰文学与戏剧批评和当前爱尔兰文学研究的最新动态.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue当代外国文学Same topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207