MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W593764623 · doi:10.4000/perspective.3304

L’Ancien et le Nouveau Monde : aboriginalité et historicité de l’art au Canada

2008· article· fr· W593764623 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ruth B. Phillips

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspective · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsNational Museum of Fine Arts of QuebecCree Board of Health and Social Services of James Bay
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'historicit peut signifi er : le fait d'tre une partie de l'histoire tablie, par opposition la prhistoire le fait d'tre une partie de l'histoire, par opposition au mythe ou la lgende anhistorique 1 . La mythologie dfi nit, la mythologie cartographie le subconscient collectif, le paysage onirique collectif des peuples, l'esprit collectif des peuples, le systme nerveux spirituel collectif, si l'on veut, dans lequel chaque corde, chaque fi l, chaque fi lament a une raison d'tre et une fonction, chaque tressaillement joue dans la manire dont le corps, l'esprit et l'me humains collectifs se meuvent et oprent de jour en jour en jour .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectiveSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207