MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W59380319

Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2010

2010· article· en· W59380319 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueGraphics Interface · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUsability and User Interface Design
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre CanadaCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGraphicsInterface (matter)Computer scienceComputer graphicsComputer graphics (images)Graphics softwareUser interfaceTrack (disk drive)Human–computer interactionComputer Graphics Metafile3D computer graphicsReal-time computer graphicsOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

You are holding the proceedings for Graphics Interface 2010. Graphics Interface is the oldest continuously-scheduled conference in computer graphics and human-computer interaction, now in its 36th year; the conference dates back to 1969, when it was the Canadian Man-Computer Communications Seminar. Graphics Interface was given its present name in 1982. In 2010, Graphics Interface takes place in Ottawa, from May 31 to June 2. The program for Graphics Interface 2010 features 33 regular papers and two short papers. We received 88 submissions and had some difficult decisions in arriving at the final selection. This year, there was a surge in papers submitted to the Interface track, resulting in a final program with a slightly stronger emphasis on HCI. Both tracks had similar acceptance rates: 39% for the HCI track and 44% for the graphics track.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it