MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W595581931

Multiculturalism and immigration in Canada : an introductory reader

2004· book· en· W595581931 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elspeth Cameron

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticulturalismImmigrationImmigration policyGender studiesPolitical sciencePopulationSociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Historical Background English-Canadian Opposition to Non-British Immigration Racism in Early Canada Immigration and Canadian Anti-Semitism The Geneva Convention Canada's Immigration: The Ideological Background Ethnicity and Social Class Immigration Policy in the Late 1960s Social Adjustment of Immigrants to Canada: 1940-1975 Multiculturalism: Ideology, Policy and Reality Aboriginal People and the Meech Lake Accord: Critical Perspectives The Ping-Pong Ethnic Politics of Contemporary Quebec The Tolerant Society versus the Accepting Society The Properties of Culture and the Possession of Identity: Postcolonial Struggle and the Legal Imagination Ethnicity and Social Class Thirty Years after the Vertical Mosaic Belonging in a Multicultural Context Residential Patterns in Cities The Social Construction of Immigrants Immigration and Demographic Structure Managing Immigrant Social Transformations The Illusion of Multiculturalism Immigration Policy: Imagined Futures The Child Eventually Grows Up From The Sacrifice A Class of New Canadians Road-Building by Pick-Axe Griff! Swimming Lessons On the Eve of Uncertain Tomorrows A Garden of Her Own Jacob Diamond Grill On Social Suffering: Fatima's Story, Parin Dossa Ethnic Origin of the Canadian Population: 1871-1971 Federal Multicultural Policy, House of Commons Debates, 8 October 1971 Canadian Multicultural Act, 1985, Department of Justice, Canada Skilled Worker Self-Assessment, Immigration Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207