Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Historical Background English-Canadian Opposition to Non-British Immigration Racism in Early Canada Immigration and Canadian Anti-Semitism The Geneva Convention Canada's Immigration: The Ideological Background Ethnicity and Social Class Immigration Policy in the Late 1960s Social Adjustment of Immigrants to Canada: 1940-1975 Multiculturalism: Ideology, Policy and Reality Aboriginal People and the Meech Lake Accord: Critical Perspectives The Ping-Pong Ethnic Politics of Contemporary Quebec The Tolerant Society versus the Accepting Society The Properties of Culture and the Possession of Identity: Postcolonial Struggle and the Legal Imagination Ethnicity and Social Class Thirty Years after the Vertical Mosaic Belonging in a Multicultural Context Residential Patterns in Cities The Social Construction of Immigrants Immigration and Demographic Structure Managing Immigrant Social Transformations The Illusion of Multiculturalism Immigration Policy: Imagined Futures The Child Eventually Grows Up From The Sacrifice A Class of New Canadians Road-Building by Pick-Axe Griff! Swimming Lessons On the Eve of Uncertain Tomorrows A Garden of Her Own Jacob Diamond Grill On Social Suffering: Fatima's Story, Parin Dossa Ethnic Origin of the Canadian Population: 1871-1971 Federal Multicultural Policy, House of Commons Debates, 8 October 1971 Canadian Multicultural Act, 1985, Department of Justice, Canada Skilled Worker Self-Assessment, Immigration Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".