Bibliographic record
Abstract
THE POEMS OF 1645 Martz, Louis L. 'The Rising Poet, 1645.' In Poet of Exile: A Study of Milton's Poetry (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980). Marcus, Leah. 'Milton as Historical Subject.' Milton Quarterly 25 (1991). Ingram, Randall. 'The Writing Poet: The Descent from Song.' Milton Studies 34 (1996). ODES Barker, Arthur. 'The Pattern of Milton's 'Nativity Ode'.' University of Toronto Quarterly 10 (1941). Evans, J. Martin. 'A Poem of Absences.' Milton Quarterly 27 (1993). Quint, David. 'Expectation and Prematurity in Milton's 'Nativity Ode'.' Modern Philology 97 (1999). Hale, John K. 'Milton Meditates the Ode.' Classical and Modern Literature 16 (1996). L'ALLEGRO AND IL PENSEROSO Miller, David M. 'From Delusion to Illumination: A Larger Structure for 'L'Allegro' and 'Il Penseroso'.' PMLA 92 (1971). Greene, Thomas M. 'The Meeting Soul in Milton's Companion Poems.' English Literary Renaissance 14 (1984). SONNETS McCarthy, William. 'The Continuity of Milton's Sonnets.' PMLA 92 (1977). Patterson, Annabel. 'That Old Man Eloquent.' In Literary Milton, edited by Diana Trevino Benet and Michael Lieb (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1994). LYCIDAS Evans, J. Martin. 'Lycidas, Daphnis, and Gallus.' In English Renaissance Studies Presented to Dame Helen Gardner, edited by John Carey (New York: Oxford University Press, 1980). Fish, Stanley. ''Lycidas': A Poem Finally Anonymous.' Glyph 8 (1981). Lipking, Lawrence. 'The Genius of the Shore: 'Lycidas', 'Adamastor', and the Poetics of Nationalism.' PMLA 111 (1996). COMUS Woodhouse, A. S. P. 'The Argument of Milton's 'Comus'.' University of Toronto Quarterly 11 (1941). Adams, Robert. 'Reading 'Comus'.' Modern Philology 51 (1953). Sensabaugh, George F. 'The Milieu of 'Comus'.' Studies in Philology 41 (1944). Marcus, Leah. 'The Earl of Bridgewater's Legal Life: Notes toward a Political Reading of 'Comus'.' Milton Quarterly 21 (1987). Martin, Jeanne. 'Transformation of Genre in Milton's 'Comus'.' Genre 10 (1977). LATIN POEMS Condee, Ralph W. 'The Latin Poetry of John Milton.' In The Latin Poetry of English Poets, edited by J. W. Binns (Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974). Corns, Thomas. 'Ideology in the Poemata (1645).' Milton Studies 19 (1984).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".