Inside the FFT Black Box: Serial and Parallel Fast Fourier Transform Algorithms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PRELIMINARIES An Elementary Introduction to the Discrete Fourier Transform Some Mathematical and Computational Preliminaries SEQUENTIAL FFT ALGORITHMS The Divide-and-Conquer Paradigm and Two Basic FFT Algorithms Deciphering the Scrambled Output from In-Place FFT Computation Bit-Reversed Input to the Radix-2 DIF FFT Performing Bit-Reversal by Repeated Permutation of Intermediate Results An In-Place Radix-2 DIT FFT for Input in Natural Order An In-Place Radix-2 DIT FFT for Input in Bit-Reversed Order An Ordered Radix-2 DIT FFT Ordering Algorithms and Computer Implementation of Radix-2 FFTs The Radix-4 and the Class of Radix-2s FFTs The Mixed-Radix and Split-Radix FFTs FFTs for Arbitrary N FFTs for Real Input FFTs for Composite N Selected FFT Applications PARALLEL FFT ALGORITHMS Parallelizing the FFTs: Preliminaries on Data Mapping Computing and Communications on Distributed-Memory Multiprocessors Parallel FFTs without Inter-Processor Permutations Parallel FFTs with Inter-Processor Permutations A Potpourri of Variations on Parallel FFTs Further Improvement and a Generalization of Parallel FFTs Parallelizing Two-Dimensional FFTs Computing and Distributing Twiddle Factors in the Parallel FFTs APPENDICES Fundamental Concepts of Efficient Scientific Computation Solving Recurrence Equations by Substitution Bibliography
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it