MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W596112678

FORECASTING DAILY USAGE OF A TOLL HIGHWAY

2000· article· en· W596112678 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ali Mekky

Bibliographic record

VenueTraffic engineering & control · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTollTransport engineeringToll roadTraffic countCalibrationStatistical analysisRegression analysisComputer scienceElectronic toll collectionOperations researchTraffic congestionEngineeringStatisticsMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

407 ETR, also known as Highway 407, is the world's first fully electronic highway to serve only an urban area; it operates in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) of Canada. It is a toll road in the GTA, built to relieve Highway 401, the busiest road in North America; about 67km of its eventual 154km is currently open. This paper describes the model development and calibration processes used to estimate the daily usage of the 407 ETR. Forecasting was required for the period 15 June 1998 to 31 December 1998, using data from 14 October 1997 to 14 June 1998. The calibration and forecasting were especially difficult, because major increases in user numbers were being obtained through progressive ramp-up. The data used here came from the electronic tolling system, which is an excellent system for highway monitoring and planning, which contains data about every vehicle using the system. The paper first develops and explains the four mathematical models used, then gives calibration results to find which model is best. After that, it gives validation results, comparing the predicted numbers of highway users with the observed numbers during a five-month period; the two sets of numbers agreed reasonably well. Statistical methods used included significance tests, regression analysis, and time series analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraffic engineering & controlSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207