MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract P246: Determinants of Remission of Overweight Status in Youth

2013· article· en· W59685920 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan McGavock, Andrea MacIntosh, Rashick Sadman, Brian Torrance, Geoff D.C. Ball, Ronald C. Plotnikoff, Sumit Majumdar, Norman Boule, Paul Wozny, Richard Lewanczuk

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOverweightCardiorespiratory fitnessBody mass indexObesityCohortConfoundingDemographyProspective cohort studyPhysical therapyCohort studyGerontologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction and hypothesis: Spontaneous remission to normal weight status occurs in ~10-20% of overweight youth. The factors that predict remission, particularly modifiable factors such as diet and physical activity (PA) are poorly understood. We hypothesized that the time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), high fitness and better diet quality would be associated with an increased likelihood of remission to normal weight status among overweight youth. Design and Methods: This was a three year prospective cohort study of 114 youth aged 9-15 years who were overweight or obese (International Obesity task Force (IOTF) cut-points) at baseline. We performed a series of regression analyses to test for predictors of remission to normal weight status at the 3-year follow up visit. The primary exposure variables were accelerometer (Actical) determined physical activity (PA) intensity, cardiorespiratory fitness assessed with a 20m shuttle run and diet quality determined from a web-based 24-hr recall tool that estimated diet quality based on meeting recommendations for daily intake of food groups. The primary outcome measure was remission to normal weight status defined as a BMI within the “healthy weight” range for age and sex in year 3 of the cohort study according to IOTF cut-points. We also tested for differences in BMI Z-score and systolic blood pressure (SBP) between youth that experienced remission and those that didn’t. We adjusted for the potential confounding effects of sedentary time, age and sex. Results: Among the 114 overweight youth studied (12 ± 2 years; BMI Z score = 1.55 ± 0.35), 18 (16%) returned to normal weight status at year 3. Remission did not occur in any youth considered obese (BMI [[Unable to Display Character: ˃]] 95th percentile) at baseline. Neither MVPA nor dietary quality was associated remission. However, remission was associated with a lower BMI Z score at baseline (1.31 ± 0.15 vs. 1.60 ± 0.35, p < 0.05) and a higher cardiorespiratory fitness (shuttle run score = 6.4 ± 2.3 vs. 4.9 ± 1.9, p < 0.05). The odds of remission were 4-fold higher (OR: 4.2 95% CI=1.04-16.7) among youth in the two upper quintiles of cardiorespiratory fitness compared to those in the lowest quintile. Despite a significant decline in BMI Z score over 3 years (-0.67 ± 0.53 vs. -0.019 ± 0.23, p < 0.05) in youth that experienced remission, no differences in SBP were observed compared to youth that remained overweight. Conclusions: Remission to normal weight status was observed in 16% of youth who were overweight at their initial assessment. Obesity and low cardiorespiratory fitness reduced the likelihood of spontaneous remission to normal weight status in overweight youth. The identification of BMI and fitness thresholds at which spontaneous remission is unlikely to occur will tailor interventions to youth with the greatest need to improve lifestyle behaviours, weight status, and overall well-being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet→French-language works237,207→