Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet ouvrage constitue une véritable synthèse des transformations majeures que le Québec a connues au cours du xxe siècle. On emploie volontiers le terme de révolution démographique pour désigner les nombreuses modifications de comportements à la base de la reproduction démographique et sociale. À l'instar de la majorité des sociétés occidentales, le Québec a clairement complété une série de transitions ; d'abord avec la baisse de la mortalité puis celle de la fécondité, ensuite avec la transformation des modes de constitution des familles et le renversement de la pyramide des âges. Les générations du baby-boom qui ont d'abord contribué à rajeunir la population québécoise contribuent désormais à son vieillissement accéléré. L'accroissement de la participation des femmes au monde du travail et la tertiarisation de l'économie posent l'épineuse question des rapports des individus au travail et à la famille. Au tournant du xxie siècle, le Québec, marqué par une immigration accrue et de plus en plus diversifiée, devra choisir son modèle d'intégration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".